THE THIRD CONFERENCE OF ABBOT CHÆREMON.
ON THE PROTECTION OF GOD.[66]
Complete Contents.
Other version available: text. [64K].
Introduction.
WHEN after a short sleep we returned for morning service and were
waiting for the old man, Abbot Germanus was troubled by great scruples
because in the previous discussion, the force of which had inspired us
with the utmost longing for this chastity which was till now unknown
to us, the blessed old man had by the addition of a single sentence
broken down the claims of man's exertions, adding that man even though
he strive with all his might for a good result, yet cannot become
master of what is good unless he has acquired it simply by the gift of
Divine bounty and not by the efforts of his own toil. While then we
were puzzling over this question the blessed Chæremon arrived at
the cell, and as he saw that we were whispering together about
something, he cut the service of prayers and Psalms shorter than
usual, and asked us what was the matter.
A question why the merit of good deeds may not be
ascribed to the exertions of the man who does them.
THEN GERMANUS: As we are almost shut out, so to speak, by the
greatness of that splendid virtue, which was described in last night's
discussion, from believing in the possibility of it, so, if you will
pardon my saying so, it seems to us absurd for the reward of our
efforts, i.e., perfect chastity, which is gained by the earnestness of
one's own toil, not to be ascribed chiefly to the exertions of the man
who makes the effort. For it is foolish, if, when for example, we see
a husbandman taking the utmost pains over the cultivation of the
ground, we do not ascribe the fruits to his exertions.
The answer that without God's help not only perfect
chastity but all good of every kind cannot be performed.
CHÆREMON: By this very instance which you bring forward we can
still more clearly prove that the exertions of the worker can do
nothing without God's aid. For neither can the husbandman, when he
has spent the utmost pains in cultivating the ground, forthwith
ascribe the produce of the crops and the rich fruits to his own
exertions, as he finds that these are often in vain unless opportune
rains and a quiet and calm winter aids them, so that we have often
seen fruits already ripe and set and thoroughly matured snatched as it
were from the hands of those who were grasping them; and their
continuous and earnest efforts were of no use to the workers because
they were not under the guidance of the Lord's assistance. As then
the Divine goodness does not grant these rich crops to idle husbandmen
who do not till their fields by frequent ploughing, so also toil all
night long is of no use to the workers unless the mercy of the Lord
prospers it. But herein human pride should never try to put itself on
a level with the grace of God or to intermingle itself with it, so as
to fancy that its own efforts were the cause of Divine bounty, or to
boast that a very plentiful crop of fruits was an answer to the merits
of its own exertions. For a man should consider and with a most
careful scrutiny weigh the fact that he could not by his own strength
apply those very efforts which he has earnestly used in his desire for
wealth, unless the Lord's protection and pity had given him strength
for the performance of all agricultural labours; and that his own will
and strength would have been powerless unless Divine compassion had
supplied the means for the completion of them, as they sometimes fail
either from too much or from too little rain. For when vigour has
been granted by the Lord to the oxen, and bodily health and the power
to do all the work, and prosperity in undertakings, still a man must
pray lest there come to him, as Scripture says, "a heaven of
brass and an earth of iron," and "the cankerworm eat what
the locust hath left, and the palmerworm eat what the cankerworm hath
left, and the mildew destroys what the palmerworm hath left."[67] Nor is it only in this that the
efforts of the husbandman in his work need God's help, unless it also
averts unlooked for accidents by which, even when the field is rich
with the expected fruitful crops, not only is the man deprived of what
he has vainly hoped and looked for, but actually loses the abundant
fruits which he has already gathered and stored up in the threshing
floor or in the barn. From which we clearly infer that the initiative
not only of our actions but also of good thoughts comes from God, who
inspires us with a good will to begin with, and supplies us with the
opportunity of carrying out what we rightly desire: for "every
good gift and every perfect gift cometh down from above, from the
Father of lights,"[68] who both
begins what is good, and continues it and completes it in us, as the
Apostle says: "But He who giveth seed to the sower will both
provide bread to eat and will multiply your seed and make the fruits
of your righteousness to increase."[69] But it is for us, humbly to follow
day by day the grace of God which is drawing us, or else if we resist
with "a stiff neck," and (to use the words of Scripture)
"uncircumcised ears,"[70] we
shall deserve to hear the words of Jeremiah: "Shall he that
falleth, not rise again? and he that is turned away, shall he not turn
again? Why then is this people in Jerusalem turned away with a
stubborn revolting? They have stiffened their necks and refused to
return."[71]
An objection, asking how the Gentiles can be said
to have chastity without the grace of God.
GERMANUS: To this explanation, the excellence of which we cannot
hastily disprove, it seems a difficulty that it tends to destroy free
will. For as we see that many of the heathen to whom the assistance
of Divine grace has certainly not been vouchsafed, are eminent not
only in the virtues of frugality and patience, but (which is more
remarkable) in that of chastity, how can we think that the freedom of
their will is taken captive and that these virtues are granted to them
by God's gift, especially as in following after the wisdom of this
world, and in their utter ignorance not only of God's grace but even
of the existence of the true God, as we have known Him by the course
of our reading and the teaching of others--they are said to have
gained the most perfect purity of chastity by their own efforts and
exertions.
The answer on the imaginary chastity of the
philosophers.
CHÆREMON: I am pleased that, though you are fired with the
greatest longing to know the truth, yet you bring forward some foolish
points, as by your raising these objections the value of the Catholic
faith may seem better established, and if I may use the expression,
more thoroughly explored. For what wise man would make such
contradictory statements as yesterday to maintain that the heavenly
purity of chastity could not possibly even by God's grace be bestowed
on any mortals, and now to hold that it was obtained even by the
heathen by their own strength? But as you have certainly, as I said,
made these objections from the desire of getting at the truth,
consider what we hold on these points. First we certainly must not
think that the philosophers attained such chastity of soul, as is
required of us, on whom it is enjoined that not fornication only, but
uncleanness be not so much as named among us. But they had a sort of
merikh, i.e., some particle of chastity; viz.
continence of the flesh, by which they could restrain their lust from
carnal intercourse: but this internal purity of mind and continual
purity of body they could not attain, I will not say, in act, but even
in thought. Finally Socrates, the most famous of them all, as they
themselves esteem him, was not ashamed to profess this of himself.
For when one who judged a man's character by his looks
(fusiognwmwn) looked at him, and said
ommata paid erastou, i.e., "the eyes of a
corrupter of boys," and his scholars rushed at him, and brought
him to their master and wanted to avenge the insult, it is said that
he checked their indignation with these words: pausaoqe,
etairoi. Eimi gar, epecw de, i.e., Stop, my friends, for
I am, but I restrain myself. It is then quite clearly shown not only
by our assertions but actually by their own admissions that it was
only the performance of indecent act, i.e., the disgrace of
intercourse, that was by force of necessity checked by them, and that
the desire and delight in this passion was not shut out from their
hearts. But with what horror must one bring forward this saying of
Diogenes? For a thing which the philosophers of this world were not
ashamed to bring forward as something remarkable, cannot be spoken or
heard by us without shame: for to one to be punished for the crime of
adultery they relate that he said to dwrean pwloumenon
qanatw mh agoraze, i.e., you should not buy with your
death what is sold for nothing.[72] It
is clear then that they did not recognize the virtue of the true
chastity which we seek for, and so it is quite certain that our
circumcision which is in the spirit cannot be acquired save only by
the gift of God, and that it belongs only to those who serve God with
full contrition of their spirit.
That without the grace of God we cannot make any
diligent efforts.
AND therefore though in many things, indeed in everything, it can be
shown that men always have need of God's help, and that human weakness
cannot accomplish anything that has to do with salvation by itself
alone, i.e., without the aid of God, yet in nothing is this more
clearly shown than in the acquisition and preservation of chastity.
For as the discussion on the difficulty of its perfection is put off
for so long, let us meanwhile discourse briefly on the instruments of
it. Who, I ask, could, however fervent he might be in spirit, relying
on his own strength with no praise from men endure the squalor of the
desert, and I will not say the daily lack but the supply of dry bread?
Who without the Lord's consolation, could put up with the continual
thirst for water, or deprive his human eyes of that sweet and
delicious morning sleep, and regularly compress his whole time of rest
and repose into the limits of four hours? Who would be sufficient
without God's grace to give continual attendance to reading and
constant earnestness in work, receiving no advantage of present gain?
And all these matters, as we cannot desire them continuously without
divine inspiration, so in no respect whatever can we perform them
without His help. And that we may ensure that these things are not
only proved to us by the teaching of experience, but also made still
clearer by sure proof and arguments, does not some weakness intervene
in the case of many things which we wish usefully to perform, and
though the full keenness of our desire and the perfection of our will
be not wanting, yet interfere with the wish we have conceived, so that
there is no carrying out of our purpose, unless the power to perform
it has been granted by the mercy of the Lord, so that, although there
are countless swarms of people who are anxious to stick faithfully to
the pursuit of virtue, you can scarcely find any who are able to carry
it out and endure it, to say nothing of the fact that, even when no
weakness at all hinders us, the opportunity for doing everything that
we wish does not lie in our own power. For it is not in our power to
secure the silence of solitude and severe fasts and undisturbed study
even when we could use such opportunities, but by a chapter of
accidents we are often very much against our will kept away from the
salutary ordinances so that we have to pray to the Lord for
opportunities of place or time in which to practise them. And it is
clear that the ability for these is not sufficient for us unless there
be also granted to us by the Lord an opportunity of doing what we are
capable of (as the Apostle also says: "For we wanted to come to
you once and again, but Satan hindered us"[73]), so that sometimes we find for our
advantage we are called away from these spiritual exercises in order
that while without our own consent the regularity of our routine is
broken and we yield something to weakness of the flesh, we may even
against our will be brought to a salutary patience. Of which
providential arrangement of God the blessed Apostle says something
similar: "For which I besought the Lord thrice that it might
depart from me. And He said to me: My grace is sufficient for thee:
for my strength is made perfect in weakness:" and again:
"For we know not what to pray for as we ought."[74]
Of the main purpose of God and His daily
Providence.
FOR the purpose of God whereby He made man not to perish but to live
for ever, stands immovable. And when His goodness sees in us even the
very smallest spark of good will shining forth, which He Himself has
struck as it were out of the hard flints of our hearts, He fans and
fosters it and nurses it with His breath, as He "willeth all men
to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth," for as He
says, "it is not the will of your Father which is in heaven that
one of these little ones should perish," and again it says:
"Neither will God have a soul to perish, but recalleth,"
meaning that he that is cast off should not altogether perish.[75] For He is true, and lieth not when He
lays down with an oath: "As I live, saith the Lord God, for I
will not the death of a sinner, but that he should turn from his way
and live."[76] For if He willeth
not that one of His little ones should perish, how can we imagine
without grievous blasphemy that He does not generally will
all men, but only some instead of all to be
saved? Those then who perish, perish against His will, as He
testifies against each one of them day by day: "Turn from your
evil ways, and why will ye die, O house of Israel?"[77] And again: "How often would I
have gathered thy children together as a hen gathereth her chickens
under her wings, and ye would not;" and: "Wherefore is this
people in Jerusalem turned away with a stubborn revolting? They have
hardened their faces and refused to return."[78] The grace of Christ then is at hand
every day, which, while it "willeth all men to be saved and to
come to the knowledge of the truth," calleth all without any
exception, saying: "Come unto Me, all ye that labour and are
heavy laden, and I will refresh you."[79] But if He calls not all generally but
only some, it follows that not all are heavy laden either with
original or actual sin, and that this saying is not a true one:
"For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God;"
nor can we believe that "death passed on all men."[80] And so far do all who perish, perish
against the will of God, that God cannot be said to have made death,
as Scripture itself testifies: "For God made not death, neither
rejoiceth in the destruction of the living."[81] And hence it comes that for the most
part when instead of good things we ask for the opposite, our prayer
is either heard but tardily or not at all; and again the Lord
vouchsafes to bring upon us even against our will, like some most
beneficent physician, for our good what we think is opposed to it, and
sometimes He delays and hinders our injurious purposes and deadly
attempts from having their horrible effects, and, while we are rushing
headlong towards death, draws us back to salvation, and rescues us
without our knowing it from the jaws of hell.
Of the grace of God and the freedom of the
will.
AND this care of His and providence with regard to us the Divine word
has finely described by the prophet Hosea under the figure of
Jerusalem as an harlot, and inclining with disgraceful eagerness to
the worship of idols, where when she says: "I will go after my
lovers, who give me my bread, and my water, and my wool, and my flax,
and my oil, and my drink;" the Divine consideration replies
having regard to her salvation and not to her wishes: "Behold I
will hedge up thy way with thorns, and I will stop it up with a wall,
and she shall not find her paths. And she shall follow after her
lovers, and shall not overtake them: and she shall seek them, and
shall not find them, and shall say: I will return to my first husband,
because it was better with me then than now."[82] And again our obstinacy, and scorn,
with which we in our rebellious spirit disdain Him when He urges us to
a salutary return, is described in the following comparison: He says:
"And I said thou shalt call Me Father, and shalt not cease to
walk after Me. But as a woman that despiseth her lover, so hath the
house of Israel despised Me, saith the Lord."[83] Aptly then, as He has compared
Jerusalem to an adulteress forsaking her husband, He compares His own
love and persevering goodness to a man who is dying of love for a
woman. For the goodness and love of God, which He ever shows to
mankind,--since it is overcome by no injuries so as to cease from
caring for our salvation, or be driven from His first intention, as if
vanquished by our iniquities,--could not be more fitly described by
any comparison than the case of a man inflamed with most ardent love
for a woman, who is consumed by a more burning passion for her, the
more he sees that he is slighted and despised by her. The Divine
protection then is inseparably present with us, and so great is the
kindness of the Creator towards His creatures, that His Providence not
only accompanies it, but actually constantly precedes it, as the
prophet experienced and plainly confessed, saying: "My God will
prevent me with His mercy."[84]
And when He sees in us some beginnings of a good will, He at once
enlightens it and strengthens it and urges it on towards salvation,
increasing that which He Himself implanted or which He sees to have
arisen from our own efforts. For He says "Before they cry, I
will hear them: While they are still speaking I will hear them;"
and again: "As soon as He hears the voice of thy crying, He will
answer thee."[85] And in His
goodness, not only does He inspire us with holy desires, but actually
creates occasions for life and opportunities for good results, and
shows to those in error the direction of the way of salvation.
Of the power of our good will, and the grace of
God.
WHENCE human reason cannot easily decide how the Lord gives to those
that ask, is found by those that seek, and opens to those that knock,
and on the other hand is found by those that sought Him not, appears
openly among those who asked not for Him, and all the day long
stretches forth His hands to an unbelieving and gainsaying people,
calls those who resist and stand afar off, draws men against their
will to salvation, takes away from those who want to sin the faculty
of carrying out their desire, in His goodness stands in the way of
those who are rushing into wickedness. But who can easily see how it
is that the completion of our salvation is assigned to our own will,
of which it is said: "If ye be willing, and hearken unto Me, ye
shall eat the good things of the land,"[86] and how it is "not of him that
willeth or runneth, but of God that hath mercy"?[87] What too is this, that God "will
render to every man according to his works;"[88] and "it is God who worketh in you
both to will and to do, of His good pleasure;"[89] and "this is not of yourselves
but it is the gift of God: not of works, that no man may
boast"?[90] What is this too
which is said: "Draw near to the Lord, and He will draw near to
you,"[91] and what He says
elsewhere: "No man cometh unto Me except the Father who sent Me
draw Him"?[92] What is it that we
find: "Make straight paths for your feet and direct your
ways,"[93] and what is it that we
say in our prayers: "Direct my way in Thy sight," and
"establish my goings in Thy paths, that my footsteps be not
moved"?[94] What is it again that
we are admonished: "Make you a new heart and a new
spirit,"[95] and what is this
which is promised to us: "I will give them one heart and will put
a new spirit within them:" and "I will take away the stony
heart from their flesh and will give them an heart of flesh that they
may walk in Thy statutes and keep My judgments"?[96] What is it that the Lord commands,
where He says: "Wash thine heart of iniquity, O Jerusalem, that
thou mayest be saved,"[97] and
what is it that the prophet asks for from the Lord, when he says
"Create in me a clean heart, O God," and again: "Thou
shalt wash me, and I shall be whiter than snow"?[98] What is it that is said to us:
"Enlighten yourselves with the light of knowledge;"[99] and this which is said of God:
"Who teacheth man knowledge;"[100] and: "the Lord enlightens the
blind,"[101] or at any rate this,
which we say in our prayers with the prophet: "Lighten mine eyes
that I sleep not in death,"[102]
unless in all these there is a declaration of the grace of God and the
freedom of our will, because even of his own motion a man can be led
to the quest of virtue, but always stands in need of the help of the
Lord? For neither does anyone enjoy good health whenever he will, nor
is he at his own will and pleasure set free from disease and sickness.
But what good is it to have desired the blessing of health, unless
God, who grants us the enjoyments of life itself, grant also vigorous
and sound health? But that it may be still clearer that through the
excellence of nature which is granted by the goodness of the Creator,
sometimes first beginnings of a good will arise, which however cannot
attain to the complete performance of what is good unless it is guided
by the Lord, the Apostle bears witness and says: "For to will is
present with me, but to perform what is good I find not."[103]
On the weakness of free will.
FOR Holy Scripture supports the freedom of the will where it says:
"Keep thy heart with all diligence,"[104] but the Apostle indicates its
weakness by saying "The Lord keep your hearts and minds in Christ
Jesus."[105] David asserts the
power of free will, where he says "I have inclined my heart to do
Thy righteous acts,"[106] but the
same man in like manner teaches us its weakness, by praying and
saying, "Incline my heart unto Thy testimonies and not to
covetousness:"[107] Solomon
also: "The Lord incline our hearts unto Himself that we may walk
in all His ways and keep His commandments, and ordinances and
judgments."[108] The Psalmist
denotes the power of our will, where he says: "Keep thy tongue
from evil, and thy lips that they speak no guile,"[109] our prayer testifies to its
weakness, when we say: "O Lord, set a watch before my mouth, and
keep the door of my lips."[110]
The importance of our will is maintained by the Lord, when we find
"Break the chains of thy neck, O captive daughter of
Zion:"[111] of its weakness the
prophet sings, when he says: "The Lord looseth them that are
bound:" and "Thou hast broken my chains: To Thee will I
offer the sacrifice of praise."[112] We hear in the gospel the Lord
summoning us to come speedily to Him by our free will: "Come unto
Me all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will refresh
you,"[113] but the same Lord
testifies to its weakness, by saying: "No man can come unto Me
except the Father which sent Me draw him."[114] The Apostle indicates our free will
by saying: "So run that ye may obtain:"[115] but to its weakness John Baptist
bears witness where he says: "No man can receive anything of
himself, except it be given him from above."[116] We are commanded to keep our souls
with all care, when the Prophet says: "Keep your souls,"[117] but by the same spirit another
Prophet proclaims: "Except the Lord keep the city, the watchman
waketh but in vain."[118] The
Apostle writing to the Philippians, to show that their will is free,
says "Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling,"
but to point out its weakness, he adds: "For it is God that
worketh in you both to will and to do of His good pleasure."[119]
Whether the grace of God precedes or follows our
good will.
AND so these are somehow mixed up and indiscriminately confused, so
that among many persons, which depends on the other is involved in
great questionings, i.e., does God have compassion upon us because we
have shown the beginning of a good will, or does the beginning of a
good will follow because God has had compassion upon us? For many
believing each of these and asserting them more widely than is right
are entangled in all kinds of opposite errors. For if we say that the
beginning of free will is in our own power, what about Paul the
persecutor, what about Matthew the publican, of whom the one was drawn
to salvation while eager for bloodshed and the punishment of the
innocent, the other for violence and rapine? But if we say that the
beginning of our free will is always due to the inspiration of the
grace of God, what about the faith of Zaccheus, or what are we to say
of the goodness of the thief on the cross, who by their own desires
brought violence to bear on the kingdom of heaven and so prevented the
special leadings of their vocation? But if we attribute the
performance of virtuous acts, and the execution of God's commands to
our own will, how do we pray: "Strengthen, O God, what Thou hast
wrought in us;" and "The work of our hands stablish Thou
upon us"?[120] We know that
Balaam was brought to curse Israel, but we see that when he wished to
curse he was not permitted to. Abimelech is preserved from touching
Rebecca and so sinning against God. Joseph is sold by the envy of his
brethren, in order to bring about the descent of the children of
Israel into Egypt, and that while they were contemplating the death of
their brother provision might be made for them against the famine to
come: as Joseph shows when he makes himself known to his brethren and
says: "Fear not, neither let it be grievous unto you that ye sold
me into these parts: for for your salvation God sent me before
you;" and below: "For God sent me before that ye might be
preserved upon the earth and might have food whereby to live. Not by
your design was I sent but by the will of God, who has made me a
father to Pharaoh and lord of all his house, and chief over all the
land of Egypt." And when his brethren were alarmed after the
death of his father, he removed their suspicions and terror by saying:
"Fear not: Can ye resist the will of God? You imagined evil
against me but God turned it into good, that He might exalt me, as ye
see at the present time, that He might save much people."[121] And that this was brought about
providentially the blessed David likewise declare saying in the
hundred and fourth Psalm: "And He called for a dearth upon the
land: and brake all the staff of bread. He sent a man before them:
Joseph was sold for a slave."[122] These two then; viz., the grace of
God and free will seem opposed to each other, but really are in
harmony, and we gather from the system of goodness that we ought to
have both alike, lest if we withdraw one of them from man, we may seem
to have broken the rule of the Church's faith: for when God sees us
inclined to will what is good, He meets, guides, and strengthens us:
for "At the voice of thy cry, as soon as He shall hear, He will
answer thee;" and: "Call upon Me," He says, "in
the day of tribulation and I will deliver thee, and thou shalt glorify
Me."[123] And again, if He finds
that we are unwilling or have grown cold, He stirs our hearts with
salutary exhortations, by which a good will is either renewed or
formed in us.
That a good will should not always be attributed to
grace, nor always to man himself.
FOR we should not hold that God made man such that he can never will
or be capable of what is good: or else He has not granted him a free
will, if He has suffered him only to will or be capable of evil, but
neither to will or be capable of what is good of himself. And, in
this case how will that first statement of the Lord made about men
after the fall stand: "Behold, Adam is become as one of us,
knowing good and evil"?[124] For
we cannot think that before, he was such as to be altogether ignorant
of good. Otherwise we should have to admit that he was formed like
some irrational and insensate beast: which is sufficiently absurd and
altogether alien from the Catholic faith. Moreover as the wisest
Solomon says: "God made man upright," i.e., always to enjoy
the knowledge of good only, "But they have sought out many
imaginations,"[125] for they
came, as has been said, to know good and evil. Adam therefore after
the fall conceived a knowledge of evil which he had not previously,
but did not lose the knowledge of good which he had before. Finally
the Apostle's words very clearly show that mankind did not lose after
the fall of Adam the knowledge of good: as he says: "For when the
Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things of the law,
these, though they have not the law, are a law to themselves, as they
show the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience
bearing witness to these, and their thoughts within them either
accusing or else excusing them, in the day in which God shall judge
the secrets of men."[126] And
with the same meaning the Lord rebukes by the prophet the unnatural
but freely chosen blindness of the Jews, which they by their obstinacy
brought upon themselves, saying: "Hear ye deaf, and ye blind,
behold that you may see. Who is deaf but My servant? and blind, but
he to whom I have sent My messengers?"[127] And that no one might ascribe this
blindness of theirs to nature instead of to their own will, elsewhere
He says: "Bring forth the people that are blind and have eyes:
that are deaf and have ears;" and again: "having eyes, but
ye see not; and ears, but ye hear not."[128] The Lord also says in the gospel:
"Because seeing they see not, and hearing they hear not neither
do they understand."[129] And in
them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah which says: "Hearing ye
shall hear and shall not understand: and seeing ye shall see and shall
not see. For the heart of this people is waxed fat, and their ears
are dull of hearing: and they have closed their eyes, lest they should
see with their eyes and hear with their ears and understand with their
heart, and be turned and I should heal them."[130] Finally in order to denote that the
possibility of good was in them, in chiding the Pharisees, He says:
"But why of your own selves do ye not judge what is
right?"[131] And this he
certainly would not have said to them, unless He knew that by their
natural judgment they could discern what was fair. Wherefore we must
take care not to refer all the merits of the saints to the Lord in
such a way as to ascribe nothing but what is evil and perverse to
human nature: in doing which we are confuted by the evidence of the
most wise Solomon, or rather of the Lord Himself, Whose words these
are; for when the building of the Temple was finished and he was
praying, he spoke as follows: "And David my father would have
built a house to the name of the Lord God of Israel: and the Lord said
to David my father: Whereas thou hast thought in thine heart to build
a house to My name, thou hast well done in having this same thing in
thy mind. Nevertheless thou shall not build a house to My
name."[132] This thought then
and this purpose of king David, are we to call it good and from God or
bad and from man? For if that thought was good and from God, why did
He by whom it was inspired refuse that it should be carried into
effect? But if it is bad and from man, why is it praised by the Lord?
It remains then that we must take it as good and from man. And in the
same way we can take our own thoughts today. For it was not given
only to David to think what is good of himself, nor is it denied to us
naturally to think or imagine anything that is good. It cannot then
be doubted that there are by nature some seeds of goodness in every
soul implanted by the kindness of the Creator: but unless these are
quickened by the assistance of God, they will not be able to attain to
an increase of perfection, for, as the blessed Apostle says:
"Neither is he that planteth anything nor he that watereth, but
God that giveth the increase."[133] But that freedom of the will is to
some degree in a man's own power is very clearly taught in the book
termed the Pastor,[134] where two
angels are said to be attached to each one of us, i.e., a good and a
bad one, while it lies at a man's own option to choose which to
follow. And therefore the will always remains free in man, and can
either neglect or delight in the grace of God. For the Apostle would
not have commanded saying: "Work out your own salvation with fear
and trembling," had he not known that it could be advanced or
neglected by us. But that men might not fancy that they had no need
of Divine aid for the work of Salvation, he subjoins: "For it is
God that worketh in you both to will and to do, of His good
pleasure."[135] And therefore he
warns Timothy and says: "Neglect not the grace of God which is in
thee;" and again: "For which cause I exhort thee to stir up
the grace of God which is in thee."[136] Hence also in writing to the
Corinthians he exhorts and warns them not through their unfruitful
works to show themselves unworthy of the grace of God, saying:
"And we helping, exhort you that ye receive not the grace of God
in vain:"[137] for the reception
of saving grace was of no profit to Simon doubtless because he had
received it in vain; for he would not obey the command of the blessed
Peter who said: "Repent of thine iniquity, and pray God if haply
the thoughts of thine heart may be forgiven thee; for I perceive that
thou art in the gall of bitterness and the bonds of iniquity."[138] It prevents therefore the will of
man, for it is said: "My God will prevent me with His
mercy;"[139] and again when God
waits and for our good delays, that He may put our desires to the
test, our will precedes, for it is said: "And in the morning my
prayer shall prevent Thee;" and again: "I prevented the
dawning of the day and cried;" and: "Mine eyes have
prevented the morning."[140] For
He calls and invites us, when He says: "All the day long I
stretched forth My hands to a disobedient and gainsaying
people;"[141] and He is invited
by us when we say to Him: "All the day long I have stretched
forth My hands unto Thee."[142]
He waits for us, when it is said by the prophet: "Wherefore the
Lord waiteth to have compassion upon us;"[143] and He is waited for by us, when we
say: "I waited patiently for the Lord, and He inclined unto
me;" and: "I have waited for thy salvation, O Lord."[144] He strengthens us when He says:
"And I have chastised them, and strengthened their arms; and they
have imagined evil against me;"[145] and He exhorts us to strengthen
ourselves when He says: "Strengthen ye the weak hands, and make
strong the feeble knees."[146]
Jesus cries: "If any man thirst let him come unto Me and
drink;"[147] the prophet also
cries to Him: "I have laboured with crying, my jaws are become
hoarse: mine eyes have failed, whilst I hope in my God."[148] The Lord seeks us, when He says:
"I sought and there was no man. I called, and there was none to
answer;"[149] and He Himself is
sought by the bride who mourns with tears: "I sought on my bed by
night Him whom my soul loved: I sought Him and found Him not; I called
Him, and He gave me no answer."[150]
How human efforts cannot be set against the grace
of God.
AND so the grace of God always co-operates with our will for its
advantage, and in all things assists, protects, and defends it, in
such a way as sometimes even to require and look for some efforts of
good will from it that it may not appear to confer its gifts on one
who is asleep or relaxed in sluggish ease, as it seeks opportunities
to show that as the torpor of man's sluggishness is shaken off its
bounty is not unreasonable, when it bestows it on account of some
desire and efforts to gain it. And none the less does God's grace
continue to be free grace while in return for some small and trivial
efforts it bestows with priceless bounty such glory of immortality,
and such gifts of eternal bliss. For because the faith of the thief
on the cross came as the first thing, no one would say that therefore
the blessed abode of Paradise was not promised to him as a free gift,
nor could we hold that it was the penitence of King David's single
word which he uttered: "I have sinned against the Lord," and
not rather the mercy of God which removed those two grievous sins of
his, so that it was vouchsafed to him to hear from the prophet Nathan:
"The Lord also hath put away thine iniquity: thou shalt not
die."[151] The fact then that he
added murder to adultery, was certainly due to free will: but that he
was reproved by the prophet, this was the grace of Divine Compassion.
Again it was his own doing that he was humbled and acknowledged his
guilt; but that in a very short interval of time he was granted pardon
for such sins, this was the gift of the merciful Lord. And what shall
we say of this brief confession and of the incomparable infinity of
Divine reward, when it is easy to see what the blessed Apostle, as he
fixes his gaze on the greatness of future remuneration, announced on
those countless persecutions of his? "for," says he,
"our light affliction which is but for a moment worketh in us a
far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory,"[152] of which elsewhere he constantly
affirms, saying that "the sufferings of this present time are not
worthy to be compared with the future glory which shall be revealed in
us."[153] However much then
human weakness may strive, it cannot come up to the future reward, nor
by its efforts so take off from Divine grace that it should not always
remain a free gift. And therefore the aforesaid teacher of the
Gentiles, though he bears his witness that he had obtained the grade
of the Apostolate by the grace of God, saying: "By the grace of
God I am what I am," yet also declares that he himself had
corresponded to Divine Grace, where he says: "And His Grace in me
was not in vain; but I laboured more abundantly than they all: and yet
not I, but the Grace of God with me."[154] For when he says: "I
laboured," he shows the effort of his own will; when he says:
"yet not I, but the grace of God," he points out the value
of Divine protection; when he says: "with me," he affirms
that it cooperates with him when he was not idle or careless, but
working and making an effort.
How God makes trial of the strength of man's will
by means of his temptations.
AND this too we read that the Divine righteousness provided for in the
case of Job His well tried athlete, when the devil had challenged him
to single combat. For if he had advanced against his foe, not with
his own strength, but solely with the protection of God's grace; and,
supported only by Divine aid without any virtue of patience on his own
part, had borne that manifold weight of temptations and losses,
contrived with all the cruelty of his foe, how would the devil have
repeated with some justice that slanderous speech which he had
previously uttered: "Doth Job serve God for nought? Hast Thou
not hedged him in, and all his substance round about? but take away
thine hand," i.e., allow him to fight with me in his own
strength, "and he will curse Thee to Thy face."[155] But as after the struggle the
slanderous foe dare not give vent to any such murmur as this, he
admired that he was vanquished by his strength and not by that of God;
although too we must not hold that the grace of God was altogether
wanting to him, which gave to the tempter a power of tempting in
proportion to that which it knew that he had of resisting, without
protecting him from his attacks in such a way as to leave no room for
human virtue, but only providing for this; viz., that the most fierce
foe should not drive him out of his mind and overwhelm him when
weakened, with unequal thoughts and in an unfair contest. But that
the Lord is sometimes wont to tempt our faith that it maybe made
stronger and more glorious, we are taught by the example of the
centurion in the gospel, in whose case though the Lord knew that He
would cure his servant by the power of His word, yet He chose to offer
His bodily presence, saying: "I will come and heal him:" but
when the centurion overcame this offer of His by the ardour of still
more fervent faith, and said: "Lord, I am not worthy that Thou
shouldest come under my roof: but speak the word only and my servant
shall be healed," the Lord marvelled at him and praised him, and
put him before all those of the people of Israel who had believed,
saying: "Verily, I say unto you, I have not found so great faith
in Israel."[156] For there would
have been no ground for praise or merit, if Christ had only preferred
in him what He Himself had given. And this searching trial of faith
we read that the Divine righteousness brought about also in the case
of the grandest of the patriarchs; where it is said: "And it came
to pass after these things that God did tempt Abraham."[157] For the Divine righteousness wished
to try not that faith with which the Lord had inspired him, but that
which when called and enlightened by the Lord he could show forth by
his own free will. Wherefore the firmness of his faith was not
without reason proved, and when the grace of God, which had for a
while left him to prove him, came to his aid, it was said: "Lay
not thine hand on the lad, and do nothing unto him: for now I know
that thou fearest the Lord, and for my sake hast not spared thy
beloved son."[158] And that this
kind of temptation can befall us, for the sake of proving us, is
sufficiently clearly foretold by the giver of the Law in Deuteronomy:
"If there rise in the midst of you a prophet or one that saith he
hath seen a dream, and foretell a sign and wonder; and that come to
pass which he spoke, and he say to thee: Let us go and serve strange
gods which ye know not, thou shalt not hear the words of that prophet
or dreamer; for the Lord your God surely trieth thee, whether thou
lovest Him with all thine heart, and keepest His Commandments, or
no."[159] What then follows?
When God has permitted that prophet or dreamer to arise, must we hold
that He will protect those whose faith He is purposing to try, in such
a way as to leave no place for their own free will, where they can
fight with the tempter with their own strength? And why is it
necessary for them even to be tried if He knows them to be so weak and
feeble as not to be able by their own power to resist the tempter?
But certainly the Divine righteousness would not have permitted them
to be tempted, unless it knew that there was within them an equal
power of resistance, by which they could by an equitable judgment be
found in either result either guilty or worthy of praise. To the same
effect also is this which the Apostle says: "Therefore let him
that thinketh he standeth, take heed lest he fall. There hath no
temptation taken you but such as is common to man. But God is
faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are
able, but will with the temptation make also a way of escape that ye
may be able to bear it."[160]
For when he says "Let him that standeth take heed lest he
fall" he sets free will on its guard, as he certainly knew that,
after grace had been received, it could either stand by its exertions
or fall through carelessness. But when he adds: "there hath no
temptation taken you but what is common to man" he chides their
weakness and the frailty of their heart that is not yet strengthened,
as they could not yet resist the attacks of the hosts of spiritual
wickedness, against which he knew that he and those who were perfect
daily fought; of which also he says to the Ephesians: "For we
wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities,
against powers, against the world-rulers of this darkness, against
spiritual wickedness in heavenly places."[161] But when he subjoins: "But God
is faithful who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are
able," he certainly is not hoping that the Lord will not suffer
them to be tempted, but that they may not be tempted above what they
are able to bear. For the one shows the power of man's will, the
other denotes the grace of the Lord who moderates the violence of
temptations. In all these phrases then there is proof that Divine
grace ever stirs up the will of man, not so as to protect and defend
it in all things in such a way as to cause it not to fight by its own
efforts against its spiritual adversaries, the victor over whom may
set it down to God's grace, and the vanquished to his own weakness,
and thus learn that his hope is always not in his own courage but in
the Divine assistance, and that he must ever fly to his Protector.
And to prove this not by our own conjecture but by still clearer
passages of Holy Scripture let us consider what we read in Joshuah the
son of Nun: "The Lord," it says, "left these nations
and would not destroy them, that by them He might try Israel, whether
they would keep the commandments of the Lord their God, and that they
might learn to fight with their enemies."[162] And if we may illustrate the
incomparable mercy of our Creator from something earthly, not as being
equal in kindness, but as an illustration of mercy: if a tender and
anxious nurse carries an infant in her bosom for a long time in order
sometime to teach it to walk, and first allows it to crawl, then
supports it that by the aid of her right hand it may lean on its
alternate steps, presently leaves it for a little and if she sees it
tottering at all, catches hold of it, and grabs at it when falling,
when down picks it up, and either shields it from a fall, or allows it
to fall lightly, and sets it up again after a tumble, but when she has
brought it up to boyhood or the strength of youth or early manhood,
lays upon it some burdens or labours by which it may be not
overwhelmed but exercised, and allows it to vie with those of its own
age; how much more does the heavenly Father of all know whom to carry
in the bosom of His grace, whom to train to virtue in His sight by the
exercise of free will, and yet He helps him in his efforts, hears him
when he calls, leaves him not when he seeks Him, and sometimes
snatches him from peril even without his knowing it.
Of the manifold grace of men's calls.
AND by this it is clearly shown that God's "judgments are
inscrutable and His ways past finding out,"[163] by which He draws mankind to
salvation. And this too we can prove by the instances of calls in the
gospels. For He chose Andrew and Peter and the rest of the apostles
by the free compassion of His grace when they were thinking nothing of
their healing and salvation. Zacchæus, when in his faithfulness
he was struggling to see the Lord, and making up for his littleness of
stature by the height of the sycamore tree, He not only received, but
actually honoured by the blessing of His dwelling with him. Paul even
against his will and resisting He drew to Him. Another He charged to
cleave to Him so closely that when he asked for the shortest possible
delay in order to bury his father He did not grant it. To Cornelius
when constantly attending to prayers and alms the way of salvation was
shown by way of recompense, and by the visitation of an angel he was
bidden to summon Peter, and learn from him the words of salvation,
whereby he might be saved with all his. And so the manifold wisdom of
God grants with manifold and inscrutable kindness salvation to men;
and imparts to each one according to his capacity the grace of His
bounty, so that He wills to grant His healing not according to the
uniform power of His Majesty but according to the measure of the faith
in which He finds each one, or as He Himself has imparted it to each
one. For when one believed that for the cure of his leprosy the will
of Christ alone was sufficient He healed him by the simple consent of
His will, saying: "I will, be thou clean."[164] When another prayed that He would
come and raise his dead daughter by laying His hands on her, He
entered his house as he had hoped, and granted what was asked of Him.
When another believed that what was essential for his salvation
depended on His command, and answered: "Speak the word only, and
my servant shall be healed,"[165]
He restored to their former strength the limbs that were relaxed, by
the power of a word, saying: "Go thy way, and as thou hast
believed so be it unto thee."[166] To others hoping for restoration
from the touch of His hem, He granted rich gifts of healing. To some,
when asked, He bestowed remedies for their diseases. To others He
afforded the means of healing unasked: others He urged on to hope,
saying: "Willest thou to be made whole?"[167] to others when they were without
hope He brought help spontaneously. The desires of some He searched
out before satisfying their wants, saying: "What will ye that I
should do for you?"[168] To
another who knew not the way to obtain what he desired, He showed it
in His kindness, saying: "If thou believest thou shalt see the
glory of God."[169] Among some
so richly did He pour forth the mighty works of His cures that of them
the Evangelist says: "And He healed all their sick."[170] But among others the unfathomable
depth of Christ's beneficence was so stopped up, that it was said:
"And Jesus could do there no mighty works because of their
unbelief."[171] And so the
bounty of God is actually shaped according to the capacity of man's
faith, so that to one it is said: "According to thy faith be it
unto thee:"[172] and to another:
"Go thy way, and as thou hast believed so be it unto
thee;"[173] to another "Be
it unto thee according as thou wilt,"[174] and again to another: "Thy
faith hath made thee whole."[175]
Of the grace of God; to the effect that it
transcends the narrow limits of human faith.
BUT let no one imagine that we have brought forward these instances to
try to make out that the chief share in our salvation rests with our
faith, according to the profane notion of some who attribute
everything to free will and lay down that the grace of God is
dispensed in accordance with the desert of each man: but we plainly
assert our unconditional opinion that the grace of God is
superabounding, and sometimes overflows the narrow limits of man's
lack of faith. And this, as we remember, happened in the case of the
ruler in the gospel, who, as he believed that it was an easier thing
for his son to be cured when sick than to be raised when dead,
implored the Lord to come at once, saying: "Lord, come down ere
my child die;" and though Christ reproved his lack of faith with
these words: "Except ye see signs and wonders ye will not
believe," yet He did not manifest the grace of His Divinity in
proportion to the weakness of his faith, nor did He expell the deadly
disease of the fever by His bodily presence, as the man believed he
would, but by the word of His power, saying: "Go thy way, thy son
liveth."[176] And we read also
that the Lord poured forth this superabundance of grace in the case of
the cure of the paralytic, when, though he only asked for the healing
of the weakness by which his body was enervated, He first brought
health to the soul by saying: "Son, be of good cheer, thy sins be
forgiven thee." After which, when the scribes did not believe
that He could forgive men's sins, in order to confound their
incredulity, He set free by the power of His word the man's limb, and
put an end to his disease of paralysis, by saying: "Why think ye
evil in your hearts? Whether is easier to say, thy sins be forgiven
thee, or to say, arise and walk? But that ye may know that the Son of
man hath power on earth to forgive sins, then saith He to the sick of
the palsy: Arise, take up thy bed, and go unto thine house."[177] And in the same way in the case of
the man who had been lying for thirty-eight years near the edge of the
pool, and hoping for a cure from the moving of the water, He showed
the princely character of His bounty unasked. For when in His wish to
arouse him for the saving remedy, He had said to him: "willest
thou to be made whole," and when the man complained of his lack
of human assistance and said: "I have no man to put me into the
pool when the water is troubled," the Lord in His pity granted
pardon to his unbelief and ignorance, and restored him to his former
health, not in the way which he expected, but in the way which He
Himself willed, saying: "Arise, take up thy bed and go unto thine
house."[178] And what wonder if
these acts are told of the Lord's power, when Divine grace has
actually wrought similar works by means of His servants! For when
Peter and John were entering the temple, when the man who was lame
from his mother's womb and had no idea how to walk, asked an alms,
they gave him not the miserable coppers which the sick man asked for,
but the power to walk, and when he was only expecting the smallest of
gifts to console him, enriched him with the prize of unlooked for
health, as Peter said: "Silver and gold have I none: but such as
I have, give I unto thee. In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth,
rise up and walk."[179]
Of the inscrutable providence of God.
BY those instances then which we have brought forward from the gospel
records we can very clearly perceive that God brings salvation to
mankind in diverse and innumerable methods and inscrutable ways, and
that He stirs up the course of some, who are already wanting it, and
thirsting for it, to greater zeal, while He forces some even against
their will, and resisting. And that at one time He gives his
assistance for the fulfilment of those things which he sees that we
desire for our good, while at another time He puts into us the very
beginnings of holy desire, and grants both the commencement of a good
work and perseverance in it. Hence it comes that in our prayers we
proclaim God as not only our Protector and Saviour, but actually as
our Helper and Sponsor. For whereas He first calls us to Him, and
while we are still ignorant and unwilling, draws us towards salvation,
He is our Protector and Saviour, but whereas when we are already
striving, He is wont to bring us help, and to receive and defend those
who fly to Him for refuge, He is termed our Sponsor and Refuge.
Finally the blessed Apostle when revolving in his mind this manifold
bounty of God's providence, as he sees that he has fallen into some
vast and boundless ocean of God's goodness, exclaims: "O the
depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How
inscrutable are the judgments of God and His ways past finding out!
For who hath known the mind of the Lord?"[180] Whoever then imagines that he can
by human reason fathom the depths of that inconceivable abyss, will be
trying to explain away the astonishment at that knowledge, at which
that great and mighty teacher of the gentiles was awed. For if a man
thinks that he can either conceive in his mind or discuss exhaustively
the dispensation of God whereby He works salvation in men, he
certainly impugns the truth of the Apostle's words and asserts with
profane audacity that His judgments can be scrutinized, and His ways
searched out. This providence and love of God therefore, which the
Lord in His unwearied goodness vouchsafes to show us, He compares to
the tenderest heart of a kind mother, as He wishes to express it by a
figure of human affection, and finds in His creatures no such feeling
of love, to which he could better compare it. And He uses this
example, because nothing dearer can be found in human nature, saying:
"Can a mother forget her child, that she should not have
compassion on the son of her womb?" But not content with this
comparison He at once goes beyond it, and subjoins these words:
"And though she may forget, yet will not I forget thee."[181]
The decision of the fathers that free will is not
equal to save a man.
AND from this it is clearly gathered by those who, led not by
chattering words but by experience, measure the magnitude of grace,
and the paltry limits of man's will, that "the race is not to the
swift nor the battle to the strong, nor food to the wise, nor riches
to the prudent, nor grace to the learned," but that "all
these worketh that one and the selfsame Spirit, dividing to every man
severally as He will."[182] And
therefore it is proved by no doubtful faith but by experience which
can (so to speak) be laid hold of, that God the Father of all things
worketh indifferently all things in all, as the Apostle says, like
some most kind father and most benign physician; and that now He puts
into us the very beginnings of salvation, and gives to each the zeal
of his free will; and now grants the carrying out of the work, and the
perfecting of goodness; and now saves men, even against their will and
without their knowledge, from ruin that is close at hand, and a
headlong fall; and now affords them occasions and opportunities of
salvation, and wards off headlong and violent attacks from purposes
that would bring death; and assists some who are already willing and
running, while He draws others who are unwilling and resisting, and
forces them to a good will. But that, when we do not always resist or
remain persistently unwilling, everything is granted to us by God, and
that the main share in our salvation is to be ascribed not to the
merit of our own works but to heavenly grace, we are thus taught by
the words of the Lord Himself: "And you shall remember your ways
and all your wicked doings with which you have been defiled; and you
shall be displeased with yourselves in your own sight for all your
wicked deeds which you have committed. And you shall know that I am
the Lord, when I shall have done well by you for My own name's sake,
not according to your evil ways, nor according to your wicked deeds, O
house of Israel."[183] And
therefore it is laid down by all the Catholic fathers who have taught
perfection of heart not by empty disputes of words, but in deed and
act, that the first stage in the Divine gift is for each man to be
inflamed with the desire of everything that is good, but in such a way
that the choice of free will is open to either side: and that the
second stage in Divine grace is for the aforesaid practices of virtue
to be able to be performed, but in such a way that the possibilities
of the will are not destroyed: the third stage also belongs to the
gifts of God, so that it may be held by the persistence of the
goodness already acquired, and in such a way that the liberty may not
be surrendered and experience bondage. For the God of all must be
held to work in all, so as to incite, protect, and strengthen, but not
to take away the freedom of the will which He Himself has once given.
If however any more subtle inference of man's argumentation and
reasoning seems opposed to this interpretation, it should be avoided
rather than brought forward to the destruction of the faith (for we
gain not faith from understanding, but understanding from faith, as it
is written: "Except ye believe, ye will not understand"[184]) for how God works all things in us
and yet everything can be ascribed to free will, cannot be fully
grasped by the mind and reason of man.
Strengthened by this food the blessed Chæremon prevented us from
feeling the toil of so difficult a journey.
Next
@